Few days back I was wondering and pondering over a thought on ‘creativity and prior knowledge’.I had posed this question to my fellow people,”Prior Knowledge –Does it rule creativity?”.Today I am sharing with my readers on what I have perceived as zone for originality and how it can be nourished by us as educators.
‘Think Out of the box’-The moment a teacher tells this to the learner, somewhere unknowingly it subdues the child’s risk taking factor in thought process.By defining a boundary called ‘box’ and then thrusting saying ‘to go out of the box’ there is ambiguity as to where to start and what is acceptable!
Why define a boundary in first place? Creating an imaginary boundary that cannot be internalized and on top of that provoking them to move out of it!
There isn’t any box. It’s all “in there or out there”. Any reply that has never been told by others in a group or in a classroom. An answer that never came out so far, a word being replaced by its synonym,an illustration that has something different from others OR any two pictures that are not same…Doesn’t it mean creativity has surfaced? An expression that says a lot more than words…Won’t we accept them as creativity?
As teachers we have always learnt pedagogical approaches that are proven to establish sound connections and lays foundation for knowledge gained. It is indeed essential. Does it stop there? In case it does, then the child is definitely ‘successful’ at the end of formal education obtained, but seldom turns himself or herself in to a decision maker later in life. It is apparent because throughout out the formal education time he/she has always perceived something out of what existed already and what will happen next lies in the predictable horizon. At times during academic sessions of Science or performing Arts, the inherent quality of not being rationale, emerges out but again in a safe zone of predictability.
We raise our chin saying we are always rationale. Being rationale means building our own ideas based on what we observe /heard previously and to create our own perceptions about something. Being rationale falls in safe zone. No one can point out our errors. That’s because it has foundation.
What is more difficult is to prove something that has no foundation. And to develop that sense in learner, it needs practice for the mind, an urge and spontaneity to overlook prior knowledge sense and yet define the unknown.
This ability to create and nurture the same to certain/marginal extent lies in our hands as an educator.
It is extremely crucial for educators to “Exploit the learner Potential” as I would term it to be. It is known that as educators we find that fear of failure is reduced or never exist in the young minds. So why not exploit their potential then, Rather than cribbing about learner not being creative enough in later years!
To avoid this I personally feel educators at class room level should avoid defining or proclaiming… ‘The correct answer is’. During last week, post my experience in setting assessment paper and answer key to that, I was sharing my views to one of my colleague on answer keys created.
I realized off-late, the vast and expanded our answer keys are prepared, we are practicing being a risk-taker and in turn it would reflect in the mind set of learners we handle.
As teachers we always believe that any reply that is given by or told by learners has had a thinking process and it reflects later. So unless we take the initiative to figure that process behind every reply we are unknowingly curbing creativity.
Coming to prior knowledge’s role in grooming creativity…it is purely in the hands of teacher who handles to transform and translate the prior knowledge as a base for creativity. It doesn’t have to be a clean canvas for new painting to be created. The existing painting can be modified or redesigned too.
It is not that easy to connect abstract ideas and henceforth develop new ideas.It becomes imperative to support the foundation with some amount of knowledge. We need to be conscious that we limit it to an extent and thereafter proceed the further sessions towards instilling problem solving skills and critical thinking ability.
Of course, an airplane came in to existence looking at the flight of bird.
Can we deny that? Don’t we enjoy remixes of popular tunes?
As teacher we need inputs, training and exposure on “Questioning Skills” practiced in class room to make our classroom transaction more enriched.
Check out my previous article on ‘Questioning skills’ that enhances academic sessions.Questioning, A skill to acquire
Please find below few more ways to kindle diversified replies from the learners.
Keep them ignited.
I always believe in the quote, “I have not failed 10,000 times but found 10,000 ways it won’t work”-Einstein
Using Precise Terminology to Encourage Thinking
Instead of Saying: | Say: |
‘Let’s look at these two pictures.’ | ‘Let’s compare the two pictures’ |
‘What do you think will happen when …’ | ‘What do you predict will happen when …’ |
‘What do you think of this story?’ | ‘What conclusions can you draw about this story?’ |
‘How can you explain …?’ | ‘What evidence do you have to support …?’ |
‘Let’s work this problem.’ | ‘Let’s analyze this problem.’ |
Adapted from: Costa & Marzano (1987)
Courtesy: http://iteslj.org
Encouraging Learners to Think About Thinking
When Learners Say | Teachers Say: |
‘The verdict is, guilty as charged.’ | ‘Describe the steps you took to arrive at that answer.’ |
‘I don’t know how to solve this question.’ | ‘What can you do to get started?’ |
‘I am ready to begin.’ | ‘Describe your plan of action.’ |
‘I like the large one the best.’ | ‘What criteria are you using to make your choice?’ |
‘I am finished.’ | ‘How do you know you’re correct?’ |
Adapted from: Costa & Marzano (1987)
Please find below a link from ted.com.It’s need of the hour in education system across the globe.The speaker shares what lies in future and why there is a necessity to change the entire outlook of public education.